Dorothy Littell Greco, marriage, family

The rest is in the pages of Common Good.

subscribe

Already a subscriber? Sign in.

To Have and to Hold, to Love and to Care — for Each Other and the World

Marriage continues to be an essential component of God’s plan for humanity. Like the physical and spiritual laws that govern our world — such as gravity, sowing and reaping — marriage is part of the created order and one of the conduits through which God accomplishes his work in the world

Ultimately, neither laws written by human hands nor individuals who disagree with orthodox, biblical standards can thwart God’s purposes. His kingdom will come, and his will shall be done. As we await his return, the question before all of us is this: What part are we going to play?

The first couple undoubtedly had the least conflictual first year of marriage on record. There were no parents to forgive or childhood wounds to process. The absence of sin meant they carried no shame. We don’t know if they loved each other as we understand love today, but based on Adam’s exuberant response in Genesis 2, it does seem that they received each other as good gifts.

Looking back on this Edenic match — perhaps the only match truly made in heaven — it all seemed so simple and so enviable. Who wouldn’t want to form a lifelong partnership with a well-matched spouse, in a breathtaking setting with all our needs provided for at no cost?

Based on the myriad of challenges that we face in the 21st century, we may wonder why Adam and Eve weren’t content and why they couldn’t fully trust God. The truth is, we’re all vulnerable to greed and doubt. Because they gave in to those powerful temptations, they suffered a devastating wound. Instead of standing adjacent and upright before their Creator, they turned their gaze away from God and bent in: Eve to Adam, and Adam to his work, resulting in a relationship marked by disconnection, envy, and idolatry. The ramifications of this wound have reverberated through history.

And yet, the injury was not fatal. Marriage has survived.

Marriage continues to be an essential component of God’s plan for humanity. Like the physical and spiritual laws that govern our world, such as gravity and sowing and reaping, marriage is part of the created order and one of the conduits through which God works and reveals himself.

Unfortunately, centuries of sin combined with shifting cultural norms have made it increasingly difficult for us to fully grasp God’s intention for marriage. As this plan pixelates and we viscerally sense that something important is slipping away, we might be tempted to distill the challenges to a singular cause or lay the blame outside our purview. This can lead to a definition of marriage that is a reaction to something outside of God’s plan, rather than an assertion of God’s design. While such responses are understandable, they can make it more difficult for couples to experience the promises marriage means to offer.

Given all these factors, is it even possible to reconnect with God’s original intentions and faithfully create marriage covenants that bring beauty, redemption, and reconciliation to individual households and the culture at large? Yes, but first we need a sturdy hermeneutic of marriage, a long view of how we got here, and commitment to create and pursue our unique marriage telos.

Fruitful Relationship(s)

According to the 1559 version of The Anglican Book of Common Prayer, marriage is a holy, honorable covenant, instituted by God, and intended to bind one man to one woman. For centuries, brides and grooms have promised to have and to hold, in sickness and health, for better or worse, “to love and to cheryshe, tyll death us depart.” Duly noted: Those of us who are married most likely did not fully understand exactly what we were saying yes to. If we had, there might have been a longer pause between the officiant’s ask and our responses.

This ancient template harkens back to Genesis 2, where God fashions man and woman: man, originating from the dust of the earth, and woman, drawn from man’s side. We should come to a full stop here and reflect on how this foreshadows the bride that was later formed from Christ’s wounded side. The specifics of the creation account provide a picture of God’s desire for man and woman to partner as equals as they embark on humanity’s mission:

Then God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and multiply. Fill the earth and govern it. Reign over the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, and all the animals that scurry along the ground” (Gen 1:28).

To take this mandate literally means that all wives and husbands are called to leave their families of origin; to cleave, or bond to each other; and then meaningfully engage in being fruitful (in its many forms) while caring for creation. That would have been more than enough to keep humanity busy for all time. But due to the fallen nature of the world, our to-do list has grown. We now have to wrestle with infertility, battle systemic racism, and heal the creation from the effects of greed. This is demanding work. In fact, it’s so demanding and so consuming that couples can easily lose sight of marriage’s holy meta-narrative. God’s word reminds and reconnects us with that big picture.

Scripture begins and ends with a wedding, and much has been written about how Adam and Eve’s covenant prefigures the ultimate wedding at the end of time. This offers a context for our marriages and reminds us of the larger story, in which marriage is meant to demonstrate and affirm God’s faithfulness and unconditional love (see Hosea) as well as usher in the kingdom of heaven. These holy actions should happen first in our family and then pulse outward in ever-widening circles to include the local body of Christ and the surrounding community.  

The (D)Evolution of Marriage

Even though God clearly communicated what marriage was to be, it didn’t take long for men and women to go off script. Seven generations after Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden, Lamech married not one, but two women. Abram laid with his wife’s maidservant, Hagar, who bore him a son. Judah had sex with his daughter-in-law, mistaking her for a prostitute. Sit with that one for a minute. Many of the patriarchs had concubines, and some esteemed men of the faith, such as King David, exhibited behaviors that would (hopefully) lead to an immediate removal from leadership in today’s church.

Far from presenting readers with a sanitized history of relationships, Scripture transparently recounts man’s proclivity toward abusing power and forsaking both monogamy and monotheism. It’s not until Jesus inaugurates God’s coming kingdom — and confronts unbiblical divorce, sexual indiscretion (including lust), and polygamy — that the possibility of a lifelong, monogamous marriage, marked by respect, mutuality, mission, and Christlike love comes back into focus. This is a lofty mandate, and through history, marriages have often lacked one or more of those key components.

For instance, until fairly recently, marriage was so steeped in pragmatism that, in the words of historian Stephanie Coontz, author of Marriage, A History, “love was seen as a bonus, not a necessity.” Through the mid to late 1700s, European and North American marriages formed or reinforced family alliances (i.e., augmented power bases), joined together adults with similar or complementary skill sets furthering family businesses, and, according to The Week, bound “women to men … [to] guarantee that a man’s children were truly his biological heirs.” This was essential because if parents could not pass their property and business on to their offspring, the family would likely face financial collapse. Some domestic roles were gender specific (e.g., women typically did the weaving and beer brewing while men plowed the fields), but for the most part, husbands and wives worked shoulder to shoulder to ensure that their families had a place to live and food to eat. We might look at marriages of this time period as less-than because they were so pragmatic, but they provided rich opportunities for spouses to partner vocationally — something that many of us never have the privilege of experiencing. And who’s to say that love and pragmatism cannot share the same bed?

As the United States was forging its new identity, much of the world was transitioning from an economy based on agriculture and craftsmanship — where family units provided for themselves and bartered for whatever they lacked — to an increasingly industrialized market economy — where family alliances and land ownership mattered less, and paid employment mattered more. Many husbands and wives stopped working together in their fields or at the cobbler’s bench, and children from non-wealthy families left home to work as miners, textile workers, bakers, domestic servants, etc. Parents lost their built-in labor and, to some extent, their unifying family mission. 

It’s impossible to know whether these and other sociological changes contributed to, or merely coincided with, two major ideological shifts that took place during this time and that continue to affect marriage today: the rise of individualism and the belief that feelings should be the primary driver in choosing our spouse.

Individualism encourages adults to value and then elevate their personal needs and desires over the needs and desires of others. In the 1800s, as this philosophy gained traction in the U.S. and Europe, its impact was felt in family systems, communities, and entire cultures. Motivated by economic opportunity and this newfound sense of agency, people packed up their belongings, said goodbye to their relatives, and relocated. What they gained in autonomy and freedom, they lost in connectedness and built-in support networks that previously characterized family life. While People of Color (and intentional communities like the Anabaptist Bruderhofs) have tended to resist individualism and prioritized keeping their kin circles intact, many American families no longer had relatives in the downstairs apartment who could babysit in a pinch. Moms dealing with postpartum depression and suddenly widowed fathers had to muscle their way through alone. In an article for The Atlantic, David Brooks observes that in the past century, “We’ve made life freer for individuals and more unstable for families. We’ve made life better for adults but worse for children.”

Not surprisingly, as the fibers that connected families have slowly frayed, it has become less acceptable for parents or grandparents to steer a young couple toward or away from the altar. Today, we’ve become so inculcated by the ethos of individualism that few of us can imagine factoring our relatives’ opinions or needs into the calculus of choosing whom we marry or where we settle — even though ancient and present-day accounts reveal that partners in arranged marriages often grow to love each other.

A much more subjective criteria began to influence the choice to marry once couples were no longer “constrained” by their family members’ opinions or needs: the feeling of being in love. Departing from generations of tradition, potential brides and grooms now expect romantic love as a prerequisite to tying the knot. Most of us probably agree that we should be free to decide who we marry, and love should be one of the primary drivers of that choice. However, this recent development has resulted in several unexpected consequences.

If we were to create a graph depicting the rise of individualism from the mid-1800s through the 1980s, it would neatly overlap with the rise in divorce (see Chapter 4 of Eli J. Finkle’s The All-or-Nothing Marriage). Couples who have been empowered to choose a spouse based on their feelings and their perceived needs rather than what others feel or need, experience less pressure to remain in a marriage if, or when, the (relational) return on investment drops. New legislation was written in response to shifting mindsets. The first no-fault divorce law was passed in California in 1969. Other states followed suit and divorces started trending upward. This continued until the 1980s when the rising divorce rate began to level off. Finkle notes, and census data shows, that over the past 10 years, divorce rates have dropped considerably. And contrary to popular myth, the divorce rate is not, and never has been, 50 percent, especially for first-time marriages. This means we all have more than a fighting chance. Though divorce is always painful and deeply disruptive, it is important to affirm that there are legitimate reasons to end a marriage, such as abandonment, cruelty, unrepentant sin, infidelity, and abuse.

At the start of the 21st century, other fundamental changes started creeping over the horizon. Now that the government, rather than the church, was determining what constitutes a marriage — making it a civil right — and the general public came to understand marriage as a legal agreement rather than a faith-based covenant, it was only a matter of time until the historic, core prerequisite of marriage being between one man and one woman would be challenged. In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing gay marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges.

This ruling was celebrated by some and condemned by others. It’s far too soon to determine if, or how, this new law might adversely influence traditional marriage. There’s a tendency, and perhaps a preference, to blame outside sources when things go awry (see Adam and Eve). Though the temptation is real, a marriage cannot flourish when dodging and blaming are habitual. Societal factors such as no-fault divorce and gay marriage may influence an individual’s resolve to stay true to their vows, but that person’s choice to disengage from, or give up on their covenant has more power to sink a marriage than a court decision or referendum. Ultimately, neither laws written by human hands nor individuals who disagree with orthodox, biblical standards can thwart God’s purposes. His kingdom will come, and his will shall be done. As we await his return, the question before all of us is this: What part are we going to play?

No items found.

The love we grow and nurture within our marriages cannot be contained within the confines of our homes. We need to share it.

Marriage Telos

Since the beginning, God has been inviting us to steward creation and cocreate in love. Determining how to do this in the context of marriage is meant to be a collaborative process between spouses and the Holy Spirit. God’s specific call upon our marriages weaves together our abilities, past experiences, and passions with the tangible needs around us. The concept of telos proves helpful in figuring this out.

In Marriage in the Middle, I define telos as, “our ultimate destination, the specific path we take, and how we love and serve those who journey with us.” It serves as a guiding purpose. As we seek to discern our telos, we might ask each other: What can our marriage uniquely offer to those in our proximity? Or, as theologian Christopher Ash writes in Marriage: Sex in the Service of God, “What purpose of the Creator might this union serve?”

Certainly, the most irreducible component of our telos, and one shared by all marriages, is faithfully loving our spouse, children, and extended family members. If we hope to succeed at this, we must fully understand what love asks of us.

Over the past 150 years, individualism and its offspring — self-actualization — have heavily influenced our understandings of love and often distorted love’s purpose in marriage. The present-tense iteration of love places a high value on passionate sexual desire (along with youthful attractiveness), compatibility (sexual and otherwise), and personal satisfaction. These factors are powerful and important, but do not provide the scaffolding we need to help us sustain our marriage vows.

For a marriage to thrive, love needs to be sacrificial, committed, and missional. In 1 Corinthians 13, the Holy Spirit raises the bar heavenward and simultaneously provides us with a litmus test for our efforts. Who among us can claim that our love is always patient, always kind, always expects the best, always hopes, and always forgives? If we’re honest, we would have to admit that even on good days, we can be lazy and inconsistent. In The Mystery of Marriage, Mike Mason refers to marriage as “an unrelenting guerrilla war against selfishness” and an institution that serves to “cauterize the ego.” Truth be told, I don’t particularly enjoy having my ego cauterized, and I certainly don’t always feel like loving my husband. Sometimes, unkind, peevish thoughts dominate my head space and make the glass I see through dangerously dark. It’s only by orienting myself to God, who is the source of all love, that the light breaks through, simultaneously revealing my folly and empowering me to do what I promised to 31 years ago.

There’s a reason why the apostle Paul’s words are frequently read at weddings: We all long for this kind of love. Perhaps we intuitively believe that God’s version is the only love sturdy enough to provide the courage, magnanimity, and scrappiness that we need to uphold our covenant during the alwaysness of married life.

When the love that originates from God flows through us to our spouse, it has the capacity to transform both of us. Fears get quieted. Lies are dismantled. Old wounds get healed. Shame finally loses its grip. We begin to believe that we really are worthy of being loved. At core, marriage invites us to love and then provides endless opportunities for us to make good on our promise.

Living this out has been more beautiful and more difficult than I could have ever imagined.

During our three-plus decades together, tears have been shed and voices have been raised. Our process of transformation has included confronting each other’s hypocrisies and working through many disagreements. We have mapped each other’s limitations and memorized the contours of each other’s pain. Along the way, as we’ve extended forgiveness, grace, and hope to each other, healing has come, and our love has deepened. This aspect of our telos will remain consistent for the entirety of our lives together.

The love we grow and nurture within our marriages cannot be contained within the confines of our homes. We need to share it. Discerning what this might look like requires imagination, creativity, discernment, and diligence. While those in faith communities tend to limit “ministry” to what happens in church on Sunday mornings or during summer mission trips, no endeavor done in love is unimportant or goes unnoticed. 

Many married couples regularly and intuitively engage in kingdom work, perhaps without even being aware of it.

According to a recent study by U.S. Senator Mike Lee and the Joint Economic Committee, couples tend to volunteer more frequently, socialize with and help their neighbors more regularly, and be more committed to religious institutions. Such activities bring stability, cohesion, and social capital. Healthy marriages also provide a safe and nurturing structure for the next generation. (Obviously, single, divorced, and cohabitating parents can create supportive households, but married couples statistically have higher incomes, higher levels of education, and move less frequently which, among other factors, are key predictors of a child’s overall flourishing.)

By opening ourselves up to the Holy Spirit and paying attention to the needs around us, possibilities snap into focus. We should not feel constrained by conventional or currently existing options. When it comes to creating a marriage telos, innovation is always welcome.

Not long after my husband and I got married, we were asked to pioneer a new type of long-term discipleship program that incorporated Scripture, sound psychological insights, healing prayer, and small-group discussion. This prophetic invitation was the beginning of what has become a 25-year endeavor to bring healing and reconciliation to the body of Christ. Our work looks different now than it did two decades ago, but we’ve remained on task. There have been seasons when we’ve felt utterly incapable and seasons when we’ve been intensely discouraged. But through it all, the joy and the connectedness that we experience as we serve others together continues to enliven us and minimize our many differences.

Regardless of our abilities, preferences, and limitations, we all need to do something. Christopher Ash brings this point home in Marriage: Sex in the Service of God:

Every married couple need[s] a sense of calling from beyond themselves. God has given to human beings the unique dignity that in responsible relationship to him they may exercise stewardship over his world, and he has instituted marriage in the context of that responsible dignity and task. There is work to be done, a garden to be tended, order to be maintained and fruitfulness to be fostered.

God invites each couple to grow specific fruit. Therefore, the work we do, the gardens we tend, and the ways we subdue our chaos will vary from marriage to marriage. But because the bible doesn’t function as a play book, we need to read our own lives as a “living epistle,” a God-breathed script-in-motion and then work out our telos together.

Creating a marriage where both partners flourish is one of the most meaningful endeavors we will ever embark upon. As we journey through life together, it’s essential that we hold onto this truth: in this now-but-not-yet age, Christ is bringing all things — including marriage — to fullness before he returns for his bride. That means we can trust God to generously provide everything that we need to create and enjoy mutually fulfilling marriages that bring transformation and serve the common good. I truly believe that our heavenly Father longs for Adam’s exuberant response to resonate with all of us: “Bone of my bone. Flesh of my flesh.” 

This story is from Common Good issue
10.
Related Articles
  
All Articles >>>
No items found.
good things come to
those in print

Scrolling works but it doesn't compare to that real-life, ink-and-paper feel.

No one said the conversations that matter should be easy. And no one said you have to enter them alone.